Global Warming or the Next Ice Age? Essay

It would be safe to assume that humour modification is going to be around for a long time and have an wonderful wedge on the lives of numerous citizenry. manhood have had a huge impact on the environment for many eld and can be linked to matchless the main factors of orbiculate calefacient. worldwide heating is a topic that has received unt white-haired attention in recent geezerhood yet our mood qualify is non a recent chore. If the U.S. Continues to ignore humour qualify then the effect on the environment testament affect humans. disrespect what many cleverness think, climate convert is well k nown across hundreds of nations to each one(prenominal)(prenominal) everywhere the world. My thesis is the Green push down scratch treetop is both quailing and expanding, and climate change can be linked to both trends.The effect humans have had on the environment can be linked to the shrinking and expanding of the Greenland ice cap. In the mass The Science a nd Politics of Global humour Change it is discussed how greenhouse gasses have been increase in the atmosphere for the last cardinal centuries or so, primarily as a result of human activity. (Dessler and curate 88). In addition, climate change will well-nigh likely affect worlds through impacts on the necessities and comforts of life such as water, energy, housing, transportation, food, natural ecosystems, and health systems. Rural communities lean to be more dependent on climate-sensitive livelihood activities and have fewer resources and upliftty support systems comp bed to urban populations (Alig 73). The growth of our population has increased our use of fuel, land, and manufacturing. All of these argon increasing emissions into our atmosphere that increases global melt.The fearfulness about climate change has been an cut off for decades. in that respects no precise date as such. The climate-change debate, like all(prenominal) policy debates, is fundamentally an arg ument over do. An action needs to be interpreted soon on how to respond to climate change. Listen to the debate and you will hear many different kinds of arguments about whether and how the climate is changing, whether human activities atomic number 18 responsible, how much of the change occurring might be natural, how the climate might change in the future, what the effects of the changes will be and whether they matter, and the feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of various responses. Although these arguments are distinct, when travel in policy debate they all serve to pee-pee a chance for what we should or should not do (Dessler and Parson 31).Scientists had long been aware of the consequences of global warming and had been urging governments to take action for many years. As far back as the 1950s there was pressure existence put on governments to take action further very little was d iodin. The matchless notwithstandingt that put the issue of global warming firm ly on the policy-making agenda was the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, this was attended by presidents, prime-ministers and heads of state from around the world. It wasnt the first-class honours degree Earth Summit but it was the genius where global warming was addressed and take to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Following inception the UNFCCC has met regularly in what is known as the collection of Parties (COP) and it was at the 3rd COP that the Kyoto protocol was adopted.If the U.S continues to ignore climate change the Greenland ice cap will continue to shrink and expand . In the opening decades of the twentieth century, real estate hucksters, railroad tycoons and even government agencies persuaded thousands of dirt-poor farmers to come to the dry and wearisome center of the Great Plains, plow up millions of acres of ancient shoplands and plant wheat. There were several reasons this was a poor idea, but for a couple of unusually firm decades, bumper crops were the norm. Then, in the 1930s, inevitable drought returned. The land dried up and, quite literally, blew remote in enormous black clouds that killed crops, livestock, children, old people and dreams which is also known as the Dust Bowl. It was the worst man-made environmental hap in American history.Now, as we grow more aware that we looking at the worst man-made environmental disaster in the history of the world, we are proving to be no more wise than the ill-judged farmers who tore up the buffalo grass (Landon-Lane 11). The United States is a case in point. Some of the best climate scientists in the world are Americans. So are some of the most eloquent and important advocates for a global compact. Moreover, global compacts are an American specialty. At pivotal moments in the twentieth century, U.S. presidents were the chief architects, master-builders, and principal funders of external institutions notably, the UN itself that constitute a rule-based world secern an d have promoted the prosperity and security now threatened by climate change. thus far in the face of that threat, all foursome of Americas most recent presidentsincluding, up until now, its current one have, for one reason or another, been unable to sneak fully to the challenge (Antholis and Talbott 24)Global warming is a very difficult problem to fix. People are having a tight time agreeing on what to do about it. For example, everyone agrees that wasting energy is a bad thing to do. But some people think that the federal government should make laws about it, while other people think it should be up to each person or business to solve what to do. In conclusion, the process may not turn back entirely, but we can canvass to keep the climate from reaching a point that we cant stop it. If everyone in the world stop polluting and go about keeping their environment clean it would help. Global warming may not be stopped but it can be reduced.